Le Corbusier

Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris

Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (6 October 1887 – 27 August 1965), known as Le Corbusier (French: [lə kɔʁbyzje]), was a Swiss-French architect, designer, painter, urban planner, writer, and one of the pioneers of what is now called modern architecture. He was born in Switzerland and became a French citizen in 1930. His career spanned five decades, and he designed buildings in Europe, Japan, India, and North and South America.

Dedicated to providing better living conditions for the residents of crowded cities, Le Corbusier was influential in urban planning, and was a founding member of the Congrès International d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM). Le Corbusier prepared the master plan for the city of Chandigarh in India, and contributed specific designs for several buildings there.

On 17 July 2016, seventeen projects by Le Corbusier in seven countries were inscribed in the list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement.[2]

1 Early life (1887–1904)
2 Travel and first houses (1905–1914)
3 Dom-ino House and Schwob House (1914–1918)
4 Painting, Cubism, Purism and L’Esprit Nouveau (1918–1922)
5 Toward an Architecture (1920–1923)
6 L’Esprit Nouveau Pavilion (1925)
7 The Decorative Art of Today (1925)
8 Five Points of Architecture to Villa Savoye (1923–1931)
9 League of Nations Competition and Pessac Housing Project (1926–1930)
10 Founding of CIAM (1928) and Athens Charter
11 Moscow projects (1928–1934)
12 Cité Universitaire, Immeuble Clarté and Cité de Refuge (1928–1933)
13 Ville Contemporaine, Plan Voisin and Cité Radieuse (1922–1939)
14 World War II and Reconstruction; Unité d’Habitation in Marseille (1939–1952)
15 Postwar projects, United Nations Headquarters (1947–1952)
16 Religious architecture (1950–1963)
17 Chandigarh (1951–1956)
18 Later life and work (1955–1965)
19 Death
20 Ideas
20.1 The Five Points of a Modern Architecture
20.2 “Architectural Promenade”
20.3 Ville Radieuse and Urbanism
20.4 Modulor
20.5 Open Hand
21 Furniture
22 Politics
23 Criticism
24 Influence
25 Fondation Le Corbusier
26 Awards
27 World Heritage Site
28 Memorials
29 Works
30 Books by Le Corbusier
31 See also
32 References
32.1 Sources
33 External links
Early life (1887–1904)

Le Corbusier (Charles-Édouard Jeanneret), 1920, Nature morte (Still Life), oil on canvas, 80.9 cm × 99.7 cm (31.9 in × 39.3 in), Museum of Modern Art, New York
Charles-Édouard Jeanneret was born on 6 October 1887 in La Chaux-de-Fonds, a small city in the French-speaking Neuchâtel canton in north-western Switzerland, in the Jura mountains, just 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) across the border from France. It was an industrial town, devoted to the manufacture of watches. (He adopted the pseudonym of Le Corbusier in 1920.) His father was an artisan who enameled boxes and watches, while his mother gave piano lessons. His elder brother Albert was an amateur violinist.[3] He attended a kindergarten that used Fröbelian methods.[4][5][6]

Like his contemporaries Frank Lloyd Wright and Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier did not have formal academic training as an architect. He was attracted to the visual arts and at the age of fifteen he entered the municipal art school in La-Chaux-de-Fonds which taught the applied arts connected with watchmaking. Three years later he attended the higher course of decoration, founded by the painter Charles L’Eplattenier, who had studied in Budapest and Paris. Le Corbusier wrote later that L’Eplattenier had made him “a man of the woods” and taught him painting from nature.[3] His father took him frequently into the mountains around the town. He wrote later, “we were constantly on mountaintops; we grew accustomed to a vast horizon.”[7] His architecture teacher in the Art School was the architect René Chapallaz, who had a large influence on Le Corbusier’s earliest house designs. However, he reported later that it was the art teacher L’Eplattenier who made him choose architecture. “I had a horror of architecture and architects,” he wrote. “…I was sixteen, I accepted the verdict and I obeyed. I moved into architecture.”[8]

Travel and first houses (1905–1914)

Le Corbusier’s student project, The Villa Fallet, a chalet in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland (1905)

The “Maison Blanche”, built for Le Corbusier’s parents in La Chaux-de-Fonds (1912)

Open Interior of the “Maison Blanche” (1912)

The Villa Favre-Jacot in Le Locle, Switzerland (1912)

Le Corbusier began teaching himself by going to the library to read about architecture and philosophy, by visiting museums, by sketching buildings, and by constructing them. In 1905, he and two other students, under the supervision of their teacher, René Chapallaz, designed and built his first house, the Villa Fallet, for the engraver Louis Fallet, a friend of his teacher Charles L’Eplattenier. Located on the forested hillside near Chaux-de-fonds. It was a large chalet with a steep roof in the local alpine style and carefully crafted colored geometric patterns on the façade. The success of this house led to his construction of two similar houses, the Villas Jacquemet and Stotzer, in the same area.[9]

In September 1907, he made his first trip outside of Switzerland, going to Italy; then that winter traveling through Budapest to Vienna, where he stayed for four months and met Gustav Klimt and tried, without success, to meet Josef Hoffmann.[10] In Florence, he visited the Florence Charterhouse in Galluzzo, which made a lifelong impression on him. “I would have liked to live in one of what they called their cells,” he wrote later. “It was the solution for a unique kind of worker’s housing, or rather for a terrestrial paradise.”[11] He traveled to Paris, and during fourteen months between 1908 until 1910 he worked as a draftsman in the office of the architect Auguste Perret, the pioneer of the use of reinforced concrete in residential construction and the architect of the Art Deco landmark Théâtre des Champs-Élysées. Two years later, between October 1910 and March 1911, he traveled to Germany and worked four months in the office Peter Behrens, where Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius were also working and learning.[12]

In 1911, he traveled again for five months; this time he journeyed to the Balkans and visited Serbia, Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, as well as Pompeii and Rome, filling nearly 80 sketchbooks with renderings of what he saw—including many sketches of the Parthenon, whose forms he would later praise in his work Vers une architecture (1923). He spoke of what he saw during this trip in many of his books, and it was the subject of his last book, Le Voyage d’Orient.[12]

In 1912, he began his most ambitious project; a new house for his parents. also located on the forested hillside near La-Chaux-de-Fonds. The Jeanneret-Perret house was larger than the others, and in a more innovative style; the horizontal planes contrasted dramatically with the steep alpine slopes, and the white walls and lack of decoration were in sharp contrast with the other buildings on the hillside. The interior spaces were organized around the four pillars of the salon in the center, foretelling the open interiors he would create in his later buildings. The project was more expensive to build than he imagined; his parents were forced to move from the house within ten years, and relocate in a more modest house. However, it led to a commission to build an even more imposing villa in the nearby village of Le Locle for a wealthy watch manufacturer. Georges Favre-Jacot. Le Corbusier designed the new house in less than a month. The building was carefully designed to fit its hillside site, and interior plan was spacious and designed around a courtyard for maximum light, significant departure from the traditional house.[13]

Dom-ino House and Schwob House (1914–1918)

Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, 1914–15, Maison Dom-Ino (Dom-ino House)
During World War I, Le Corbusier taught at his old school in La-Chaux-de-Fonds, He concentrated on theoretical architectural studies using modern techniques.[14] In December 1914, along with the engineer Max Dubois, he began a serious study of the use of reinforced concrete as a building material. He had first discovered concrete working with Auguste Perret in Paris, but now wanted to use it in new ways.

“Reinforced concrete provided me with incredible resources,” he wrote later, “and variety, and a passionate plasticity in which by themselves my structures will be rhythm of a palace, and a Pompieen tranquility.”.[15] This led him to his plan for the Dom-Ino House (1914–15). This model proposed an open floor plan consisting of three concrete slabs supported by six thin reinforced concrete columns, with a stairway providing access to each level on one side of the floor plan.[16] The system was originally designed to provide large numbers of temporary residences after World War I, producing only slabs, columns and stairways, and residents could build exterior walls with the materials around the site. He described it in his patent application as “a juxtiposable system of construction according to an infinite number of combinations of plans. This would permit, he wrote, “the construction of the dividing walls at any point on the façade or the interior.”

The Anatole Schwob House in La-Chaux-de-Fonds (1916–1918)
Under this system, the structure of the house did not have to appear on the outside, but could be hidden behind a glass wall, and the interior could be arranged in any way the architect liked.[17] After it was patented, Le Corbusier designed a number of houses according to the system, which were all white concrete boxes. Although some of these were never built, they illustrated his basic architectural ideas which would dominate his works throughout the 1920s. He refined the idea in his 1927 book on the Five Points of a New Architecture. This design, which called for the disassociation of the structure from the walls, and the freedom of plans and façades, became the foundation for most of his architecture over the next ten years.[18]

In August 1916, Le Corbusier received his largest commission ever, to construct a villa for the Swiss watchmaker Anatole Schwob, for whom he had already completed several small remodeling projects. He was given a large budget and the freedom to design not only the house, but also to create the interior decoration and choose the furniture. Following the precepts of Auguste Perret, he built the structure out of reinforced concrete and filled the gaps with brick. The center of the house is a large concrete box with two semicolumn structures on both sides, which reflects his ideas of pure geometrical forms. A large open hall with a chandelier occupied the center of the building. “You can see,” he wrote to Auguste Perret in July 1916, “that Auguste Perret left more in me than Peter Behrens.”[19]

Le Corbusier’s grand ambitions collided with the ideas and budget of his client, and led to bitter conflicts. Schwob went to court and denied Le Corbusier access to site, or the right to claim to be the architect. Le Corbusier responded, “Whether you like it or not, my presence is inscribed in every corner of your house.” Le Corbusier took great pride in the house, and reproduced pictures in several of his books.[20]

Painting, Cubism, Purism and L’Esprit Nouveau (1918–1922)

Le Corbusier, 1921, Nature morte (Still Life), oil on canvas, 54 x 81 cm, Musée National d’Art Moderne, Paris

Le Corbusier, 1922, Nature morte verticale (Vertical Still Life), oil on canvas, 146.3 cm × 89.3 cm (57.6 by 35.2 inches), Kunstmuseum Basel

Le Corbusier, 1920, Guitare verticale (2ème version), oil on canvas, 100 cm × 81 cm (39 in × 32 in), Fondation Le Corbusier, Paris
Le Corbusier moved to Paris definitively in 1917 and began his own architectural practice with his cousin, Pierre Jeanneret (1896–1967), a partnership that would last until the 1950s, with an interruption in the World War II years[21]

In 1918, Le Corbusier met the Cubist painter Amédée Ozenfant, in whom he recognised a kindred spirit. Ozenfant encouraged him to paint, and the two began a period of collaboration. Rejecting Cubism as irrational and “romantic”, the pair jointly published their manifesto, Après le cubisme and established a new artistic movement, Purism. Ozenfant and Le Corbusier began writing for a new journal, L’Esprit Nouveau, and promoted with energy and imagination his ideas of architecture.

In the first issue of the journal, in 1920, Charles-Edouard Jeanneret adopted Le Corbusier (an altered form of his maternal grandfather’s name, Lecorbésier) as a pseudonym, reflecting his belief that anyone could reinvent themselves.[22][23] Adopting a single name to identify oneself was in vogue by artists in many fields during that era, especially in Paris.

Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier did not build anything, concentrating his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, he and his cousin Pierre Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres.[14] His theoretical studies soon advanced into several different single-family house models. Among these was the Maison “Citrohan”, a pun on the name of the French Citroën automaker, for the modern industrial methods and materials Le Corbusier advocated using for the house. Here, Le Corbusier proposed a three-floor structure, with a double-height living room, bedrooms on the second floor, and a kitchen on the third floor. The roof would be occupied by a sun terrace. On the exterior Le Corbusier installed a stairway to provide second-floor access from ground level. Here, as in other projects from this period, he also designed the façades to include large uninterrupted banks of windows. The house used a rectangular plan, with exterior walls that were not filled by windows but left as white, stuccoed spaces. Le Corbusier and Jeanneret left the interior aesthetically spare, with any movable furniture made of tubular metal frames. Light fixtures usually comprised single, bare bulbs. Interior walls also were left white.

Toward an Architecture (1920–1923)
In 1922 and 1923, Le Corbusier devoted himself to advocating his new concepts of architecture and urban planning in a series of polemical articles published in L’Esprit Nouveau. At the Paris Salon d’Automne in 1922, he presented his plan for the Ville Contemporaine, a model city for three million people, whose residents would live and work in a group of identical sixty-story tall apartment buildings surrounded by lower zig-zag apartment blocks and a large park. In 1923, he collected his essays from L’Esprit Nouveau published his first and most influential book, Towards an Architecture. He presented his ideas for the future of architecture in a series of maxims, declarations, and exhortations. commencing with “A grand epoch has just begun. There exists a new spirit. There already exist a crowd of works in the new spirit, they are found especially in industrial production. Architecture is suffocating in its current uses. “Styles” are a lie. Style is a unity of principles which animates all the work of a period and which result in a characteristic spirit…Our epoch determines each day its style..-Our eyes, unfortunately don’t know how to see it yet,” and his most famous maxim, “A house is a machine to live in.” Most of the many photographs and drawings in the book came from outside the world of traditional architecture; the cover showed the promenade deck of an ocean liner, while others showed racing cars, airplanes, factories, and the huge concrete and steel arches of zeppelin hangars.[24]

L’Esprit Nouveau Pavilion (1925)

The Pavilion of the Esprit Nouveau (1925)

The model of the Plan Voisin for the reconstruction of Paris displayed at the Pavilion of the Esprit Nouveau
An important early work of Le Corbusier was the Esprit Nouveau Pavilion, built for the 1925 Paris International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts, the event which later gave Art Deco its name. Le Corbusier built the pavilion in collaboration with Amédée Ozenfant and with his cousin Pierre Jeanneret. Le Corbusier and Ozenfant had broken with Cubism and formed the Purism movement in 1918 and in 1920 founded their journal L’Esprit Nouveau in 1920. In his new journal, Le Corbusier vividly denounced the decorative arts: “Decorative Art, as opposed to the machine phenomenon, is the final twitch of the old manual modes, a dying thing.” To illustrate his ideas, he and Ozenfant decided to create small pavilion at the Exposition, representing his idea of the future urban housing unit. A house, he wrote, “is a cell within the body of a city. The cell is made up of the vital elements which are the mechanics of a house…Decorative art is antistandarizational. Our pavilion will contain only standard things created by industry in factories and mass produced, objects truly of the style of today…my pavilion will therefore be a cell extracted from a huge apartment building.”[25]

Le Corbusier and his collaborators were given a plot of land located behind the Grand Palais in the center of the Exposition. The plot was forested, and exhibitors could not cut down trees, so Le Corbusier built his pavilion with a tree in the center, emerging through a hole in the roof. The building was a stark white box with an interior terrace and square glass windows. The interior was decorated with a few cubist paintings and with a few pieces of mass-produced commercially available furniture, entirely different from the expensive, one-of-a-kind pieces in the other pavilions. The chief organizers of the Exposition were furious, and built a fence to partially hide the pavilion. Le Corbusier had to appeal to the Ministry of Fine Arts, which ordered that fence be taken down.[25]

Besides the furniture, the pavilion exhibited a model of his Plan Voisin his provocative plan for rebuilding a large part of the centre of Paris. He proposed to bulldoze a large area north of the Seine and replace the narrow streets, monuments and houses with giant sixty-story cruciform towers placed within an orthogonal street grid and park-like green space. His scheme was met with criticism and scorn from French politicians and industrialists, although they were favorable to the ideas of Taylorism and Fordism underlying his designs. The plan was never seriously considered, but it provoked discussion concerning how to deal with the overcrowded poor working-class neighborhoods of Paris, and it later saw partial realization in the housing developments built in the Paris suburbs in the 1950s and 1960s.

The Pavilion was ridiculed by many critics, but Le Corbusier, undaunted, wrote: “Right now one thing is sure. 1925 marks the decisive turning point in the quarrel between the old and new. After 1925, the antique-lovers will have virtually ended their lives . . . Progress is achieved through experimentation; the decision will be awarded on the field of battle of the ‘new’.”[26]

The Decorative Art of Today (1925)
In 1925, Le Corbusier combined a series of articles about decorative art from “L’Esprit Nouveau” into a book, L’art décoratif d’aujourd’hui (The Decorative Art of Today).[27][28] The book was a spirited attack on the very idea of decorative art. His basic premise, repeated throughout the book, was: “Modern decorative art has no decoration.”[29] He attacked with enthusiasm the styles presented at the 1925 Exposition of Decorative Arts: “The desire to decorate everything about one is a false spirit and an abominable small perversion….The religion of beautiful materials is in its final death agony…The almost hysterical onrush in recent years toward this quasi-orgy of decor is only the last spasm of a death already predictable.”[30] He cited the 1912 book of the Austrian architect Adolf Loos “Ornament and crime”, and quoted Loos’s dictum, “The more a people are cultivated, the more decor disappears.” He attacked the deco revival of classical styles, what he called “Louis Philippe and Louis XVI moderne”; he condemned the “symphony of color” at the Exposition, and called it “the triumph of assemblers of colors and materials. They were swaggering in colors… They were making stews out of fine cuisine.” He condemned the exotic styles presented at the Exposition based on the art of China, Japan, India and Persia. “It takes energy today to affirm our western styles.” He criticized the “precious and useless objects that accumulated on the shelves” in the new style. He attacked the “rustling silks, the marbles which twist and turn, the vermilion whiplashes, the silver blades of Byzantium and the Orient…Let’s be done with it!”[31]

“Why call bottles, chairs, baskets and objects decorative?” Le Corbusier asked. “They are useful tools….Decor is not necessary. Art is necessary.” He declared that in the future the decorative arts industry would produce only “objects which are perfectly useful, convenient, and have a true luxury which pleases our spirit by their elegance and the purity of their execution, and the efficiency of their services. This rational perfection and precise determinate creates the link sufficient to recognize a style.” He described the future of decoration in these terms: “The ideal is to go work in the superb office of a modern factory, rectangular and well-lit, painted in white Ripolin (a major French paint manufacturer); where healthy activity and laborious optimism reign.” He concluded by repeating “Modern decoration has no decoration”.[31]

The book became a manifesto for those who opposed the more traditional styles of the decorative arts; In the 1930s, as Le Corbusier predicted, the modernized versions of Louis Philippe and Louis XVI furniture and the brightly colored wallpapers of stylized roses were replaced by a more sober, more streamlined style. Gradually the modernism and functionality proposed by Le Corbusier overtook the more ornamental style. The shorthand titles that Le Corbusier used in the book, 1925 Expo: Arts Deco was adapted in 1966 by the art historian Bevis Hillier for a catalog of an exhibition on the style, and in 1968 in the title of a book, Art Deco of the 20s and 30s. And thereafter the term “Art Deco” was commonly used as the name of the style.[32]

Five Points of Architecture to Villa Savoye (1923–1931)
Main articles: Villa Savoye and Le Corbusier’s Five Points of Architecture

The Villa La Roche-Jeanneret (now Fondation Le Corbusier) in Paris (1923)

Corbusier Haus (right) and Citrohan Haus in Weissenhof, Stuttgart, Germany (1927)

The Villa Savoye in Poissy (1928–1931)

The notoriety that Le Corbusier achieved from his writings and the Pavilion at the 1925 Exposition led to commissions to build a dozen residences in Paris and in the Paris region in his “purist style.” These included the Maison La Roche/Albert Jeanneret (1923–1925), which now houses the Fondation Le Corbusier; the Maison Guiette in Antwerp, Belgium (1926); a residence for Jacques Lipchitz; the Maison Cook, and the Maison Planeix. In 1927, he was invited by the German Werkbund to build three houses in the model city of Weissenhof near Stuttgart, based on the Citrohan House and other theoretical models he had published. He described this project in detail one of his best-known essays, the Five Points of Architecture.[33]

The following year he began the Villa Savoye (1928–1931), which became one of the most famous of Le Corbusier’s works, and an icon of modernist architecture. Located in Poissy, in a landscape surrounded by trees and large lawn, the house is an elegant white box poised on rows of slender pylons, surrounded by a horizontal band of windows which fill the structure with light. The service areas (parking, rooms for servants and laundry room) are located under the house. Visitors enter a vestibule from which a gentle ramp leads to the house itself. The bedrooms and salons of the house are distributed around a suspended garden; the rooms look both out at the landscape and into the garden, which provides additional light and air. Another ramp leads up to the roof, and a stairway leads down to the cellar under the pillars.

Villa Savoye succinctly summed up the five points of architecture that he had elucidated in L’Esprit Nouveau and the book Vers une architecture, which he had been developing throughout the 1920s. First, Le Corbusier lifted the bulk of the structure off the ground, supporting it by pilotis, reinforced concrete stilts. These pilotis, in providing the structural support for the house, allowed him to elucidate his next two points: a free façade, meaning non-supporting walls that could be designed as the architect wished, and an open floor plan, meaning that the floor space was free to be configured into rooms without concern for supporting walls. The second floor of the Villa Savoye includes long strips of ribbon windows that allow unencumbered views of the large surrounding garden, and which constitute the fourth point of his system. The fifth point was the roof garden to compensate for the green area consumed by the building and replacing it on the roof. A ramp rising from ground level to the third-floor roof terrace allows for a promenade architecturale through the structure. The white tubular railing recalls the industrial “ocean-liner” aesthetic that Le Corbusier much admired.

Le Corbusier was quite rhapsodic when describing the house in Précisions in 1930: “the plan is pure, exactly made for the needs of the house. It has its correct place in the rustic landscape of Poissy. It is Poetry and lyricism, supported by technique.”[34] The house had its problems; the roof persistently leaked, due to construction faults; but it became a landmark of modern architecture and one of the best-known works of Le Corbusier.[34]

League of Nations Competition and Pessac Housing Project (1926–1930)

Low-cost housing units built by Le Corbusier in the Quartiers Modernes Frugès in Pessac (1927)
Thanks to his passionate articles in L’Esprit Nouveau, his participation in the 1925 Decorative Arts Exposition and the conferences he gave on the new spirit of architecture, Le Corbusier had become well known in the architectural world, though he had only built residences for wealthy clients. In 1926, he entered the competition for the construction of a headquarters for the League of Nations in Geneva with a plan for an innovative lakeside complex of modernist white concrete office buildings and meeting halls. There were three-hundred thirty seven projects in competition. It appeared that the Corbusier’s project was the first choice of the architectural jury, but after much behind-the scenes maneuvering the jury declared it was unable to pick a single winner, and the project was given instead to the top five architects, who were all neoclassicists. Le Corbusier was not discouraged; he presented his own plans to the public in articles and lectures to show the opportunity that the League of Nations had missed.[35]

In 1927, Le Corbusier received the opportunity he had been looking for; he was commissioned by a Bordeaux industrialist, Henry Frugès a fervent admirer of his ideas on urban planning, to build a complex of worker housing, the Quartiers Modernes Frugès, at Pessac, near Bordeaux. Le Corbusier described Pessac as “A little like a Balzac novel”, a chance to create a whole community for living and working. The Fruges quarter became his first laboratory for a residential housing; a series of rectangular blocks composed of modular housing units located in a garden setting. Like the unit displayed at the 1925 Exposition, each housing unit had its own small terrace. The earlier villas he constructed all had white exterior walls, but for Pessac, at the request of his clients, he added color; panels of brown, yellow and jade green, coordinated by Le Corbusier. Originally planned to have some two hundred units, it finally contained about fifty to seventy housing units, in eight buildings. Pessac became the model on a small scale for his later and much larger Cité Radieuse projects.[36]

Founding of CIAM (1928) and Athens Charter
In 1928, Le Corbusier took a major step toward establishing modernist architecture as the dominant European style. Le Corbusier had met with many of the leading German and Austrian modernists during the competition for the League of Nations in 1927. In the same year, the German Werkbund organized an architectural exposition at the Weissenhof Estate Stuttgart. Seventeen leading modernist architects in Europe were invited to design twenty-one houses; Le Corbusier and Mies Van der Rohe played a major part. In 1927 Le Corbusier, Pierre Chareau and others proposed the foundation of an international conference to establish the basis for a common style. The first meeting of the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne or International Congresses of Modern Architects (CIAM), was held in a château on Lake Leman in Switzerland 26–28 June 1928. Those attending included Le Corbusier, Robert Mallet-Stevens, Auguste Perret, Pierre Chareau and Tony Garnier from France; Victor Bourgeois from Belgium; Walter Gropius, Erich Mendelsohn, Ernst May and Mies Van der Rohe from Germany; Josef Frank from Austria; Mart Stam and Gerrit Rietveld from the Netherlands, and Adolf Loos from Czechoslovakia. A delegation of Soviet architects was invited to attend, but they were unable to obtain visas. Later members included Josep Lluís Sert of Spain and Alvar Aalto of Finland. No one attended from the United States. A second meeting was organized in 1930 in Brussels by Victor Bourgeois on the topic “Rational methods for groups of habitations”. A third meeting, on “The functional city”, was scheduled for Moscow in 1932, but was cancelled at the last minute. Instead the delegates held their meeting on a cruise ship traveling between Marseille and Athens. On board, they together drafted a text on how modern cities should be organized. The text, called The Athens Charter, after considerable editing by Le Corbusier and others, was finally published in 1943 and became an influential text for city planners in the 1950s and 1960s. The group met once more in Paris in 1937 to discuss public housing and was scheduled to meet in the United States in 1939, but the meeting was cancelled because of the war. The legacy of the CIAM was a roughly common style and doctrine which helped define modern architecture in Europe and the United States after World War II.[37]

Moscow projects (1928–1934)
Main article: Le Corbusier in the USSR

Building of the Tsentrosoyuz, headquarters of Soviet trade unions, Moscow (1928–34)
Le Corbusier saw the new society founded in the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution as a promising laboratory for his architectural ideas. He met the Russian architect Konstantin Melnikov during the 1925 Decorative Arts Exposition in Paris, and admired the construction of Melnikov’s constructvist USSR pavilion, the only truly modernist building in the Exposition other than his own Esprit Nouveau pavilion. At Melnikov’s invitation he traveled to Moscow, where found that his writings had been published in Russian; he gave lectures and interviews, and between 1928 and 1932 he constructed an office building for the Tsentrosoyuz, the headquarters of Soviet trade unions.

In 1932, he was invited to take part in an international competition for the new Palace of the Soviets in Moscow, which was to be built on the site of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, demolished on Stalin’s orders. Le Corbusier contributed a highly original plan, a low-level complex of circular and rectangular buildings and a rainbow-like arch from which the roof of the main meeting hall was suspended. To Le Corbusier’s distress, his plan was rejected by Stalin in favor of a plan for a massive neoclassical tower, the highest in Europe, crowned with a statue of Vladimir Lenin. The Palace was never built; construction was stopped by World War II, a swimming pool took its place; and after the collapse of the USSR the cathedral was rebuilt on its original site.[38]

Cité Universitaire, Immeuble Clarté and Cité de Refuge (1928–1933)

The Immeuble Clarté in Geneva (1930–1932)

The Swiss Foundation in the Cité internationale universitaire de Paris (1929–1933)

Between 1928 and 1934, as Le Corbusier’s reputation grew, he received commissions to construct a wide variety of buildings. In 1928 he received a commission from the Soviet government to construct the headquarters of the Tsentrosoyuz, or central office of trade unions, a large office building whose glass walls alternated with plaques of stone. He built the Villa de Madrot in Le Pradet (1929–1931); and an apartment in Paris for Charles de Bestigui at the top of an existing building on the Champs-Élysées 1929–1932, (later demolished). In 1929–1930 he constructed a floating homeless shelter for the Salvation Army on the left bank of the Seine at the Pont d’Austerlitz. Between 1929 and 1933, he built a larger and more ambitious project for the Salvation Army, the Cité de Refuge, on rue Cantagrel in the 13th arrondissement of Paris. He also constructed the Swiss Pavilion in the Cité Universitaire in Paris with 46 units of student housing, (1929–33). He designed furniture to go with the building; the main salon was decorated with a montage of black-and-white photographs of nature. In 1948, he replaced this with a colorful mural he painted himself. In Geneva he built a glass-walled apartment building with forty-five units, the Immeuble Clarté. Between 1931 and 1945 he built an apartment building with fifteen units, including an apartment and studio for himself on the 6th and 7th floors, at 4 rue Nungesser-et-Coli in the 16th arrondissement in Paris. overlooking the Bois de Boulogne.[39] His apartment and studio are owned today by the Fondation Le Corbusier, and can be visited.

Ville Contemporaine, Plan Voisin and Cité Radieuse (1922–1939)
See also: Unité d’habitation and Ville Radieuse
As the global Great Depression enveloped Europe, Le Corbusier devoted more and more time to his ideas for urban design and planned cities. He believed that his new, modern architectural forms would provide an organizational solution that would raise the quality of life for the working classes. In 1922 he had presented his model of the Ville Contemporaine, a city of three million inhabitants, at the Salon d’Automne in Paris. His plan featured tall office towers with surrounded by lower residential blocks in a park setting. He reported that “analysis leads to such dimensions, to such a new scale, and to such the creation of an urban organism so different from those that exist, that it that the mind can hardly imagine it.”[40] The Ville Contemporaine, presenting an imaginary city in an imaginary location, did not attract the attention that Le Corbusier wanted. For his next proposal, the Plan Voisin (1925), he took a much more provocative approach; he proposed to demolish a large part of central Paris and to replace it with a group of sixty-story cruciform office towers surrounded by parkland. This idea shocked most viewers, as it was certainly intended to do. The plan included a multi-level transportation hub that included depots for buses and trains, as well as highway intersections, and an airport. Le Corbusier had the fanciful notion that commercial airliners would land between the huge skyscrapers. He segregated pedestrian circulation paths from the roadways and created an elaborate road network. Groups of lower-rise zigzag apartment blocks, set back from the street, were interspersed among the office towers. Le Corbusier wrote: “The center of Paris, currently threatened with death, threatened by exodus, is in reality a diamond mine…To abandon the center of Paris to its fate is to desert in face of the enemy.” [41]

As no doubt Le Corbusier expected, no one hurried to implement the Plan Voisin, but he continued working on variations of the idea and recruiting followers. In 1929, he traveled to Brazil where he gave conferences on his architectural ideas. He returned with drawings of his own vision for Rio de Janeiro; he sketched serpentine multi-story apartment buildings on pylons, like inhabited highways, winding through Rio Janeiro.

In 1931, he developed a visionary plan for another city Algiers, then part of France. This plan, like his Rio Janeiro plan, called for the construction of an elevated viaduct of concrete, carrying residential units, which would run from one end of the city to the other. This plan, unlike his early Plan Voisin, was more conservative, because it did not call for the destruction of the old city of Algiers; the residential housing would be over the top of the old city. This plan, like his Paris plans, provoked discussion, but never came close to realization.

In 1935, Le Corbusier made his first visit to the United States. He was asked by American journalists what he thought about New York City skyscrapers; he responded, characteristically, that he found them “much too small”.[42] He wrote a book describing his experiences in the States, Quand les Cathédrales etait blanc- voyages au pays des timides (When Cathedrals were White; voyage to the land of the timid) whose title expressed his view of the lack of boldness in American architecture.[43]

He wrote a great deal but built very little in the late 1930s. The titles of his books expressed the combined urgency and optimism of his messages: Cannons? Munitions? No thank you, Lodging please! (1938) and The lyricism of modern times and urbanism (1939).

In 1928, the French Minister of Labour, Louis Loucheur, won the passage of a French law on public housing, calling for the construction of 260,000 new housing units within five years. Le Corbusier immediately began to design a new type of modular housing unit, which he called the Maison Loucheur, which would be suitable for the project. These units were forty-five square metres (480 square feet) in size, made with metal frames, and were designed to be mass-produced and then transported to the site, where they would be inserted into frameworks of steel and stone; The government insisted on stone walls to win the support of local building contractors. The standardisation of apartment buildings was the essence of what Le Corbusier termed the Ville Radieuse or “radiant city”, in a new book which published in 1935. The Radiant City was similar to his earlier Contemporary City and Plan Voisin, with the difference that residences would be assigned by family size, rather than by income and social position. In his 1935 book, he developed his ideas for a new kind of city, where the principle functions; heavy industry, manufacturing, habitation and commerce, would be clearly separated into their own neighbourhoods, carefully planned and designed. However, before any units could be built, World War II intervened.

World War II and Reconstruction; Unité d’Habitation in Marseille (1939–1952)

The modular design of the apartments inserted into the building

Internal “street” within the Unité d’Habitation, Marseille (1947–1952)

Salon and Terrace of an original unit of the Unité d’Habitation, now at the Cité de l’Architecture et du Patrimoine in Paris (1952)

During the War and the German occupation of France, Le Corbusier did his best to promote his architectural projects. He moved to Vichy for a time, where the collaborationist government of Marshal Philippe Petain was located, offering his services for architectural projects, including his plan for the reconstruction of Algiers, but they were rejected. He continued writing, completing Sur les Quatres routes (On the Four Routes) in 1941. After 1942, Le Corbusier left Vichy for Paris.[44] He became for a time a technical adviser at Alexis Carrel’s eugenic foundation, he resigned from this position on 20 April 1944.[45] In 1943, he founded a new association of modern architects and builders, the Ascoral, the Assembly of Constructors for a renewal of architecture, but there were no projects to build.[46]

When the war ended, Le Corbusier was nearly sixty years old, and he had not had a single project realized in ten years. He tried, without success, to obtain commissions for several of the first large reconstruction projects, but his proposals for the reconstruction of the town of Saint-Dié and for La Rochelle were rejected. Still, he persisted; Le Corbusier finally found a willing partner in Raoul Dautry, the new Minister of Reconstruction and Urbanism. Dautry agreed to fund one of his projects, a “Unité d’habitation de grandeur conforme”, or housing units of standard size, with the first one to be built in Marseille, which had been heavily damaged during the war.[47]

This was his first public commission, and was a major breakthrough for Le Corbusier. He gave the building the name of his pre-war theoretical project, the Cité Radieuse, and followed the principles that he had studied before the war, he proposed a giant reinforced concrete framework, into which modular apartments would be fit like bottles into a bottle rack. Like the Villa Savoye, the structure was poised on concrete pylons though, because of the shortage of steel to reinforce the concrete, the pylons were more massive than usual. The building contained 337 duplex apartment modules to house a total of 1,600 people. Each module was three stories high, and contained two apartments, combined so each had two levels (see diagram above). The modules ran from one side of the building to the other, and each apartment had a small terrace at each end. They were ingeniously fitted together like pieces of a Chinese puzzle, with a corridor slotted through the space between the two apartments in each module. Residents had a choice of twenty-three different configurations for the units. Le Corbusier designed furniture, carpets and lamps to go with the building, all purely functional; the only decoration was a choice of interior colors that Le Corbusier gave to residents. The only mildly decorative features of the building were the ventilator shafts on the roof, which Le Corbusier made to look like the smokestacks of an ocean liner, a functional form that he admired.

The building was designed not just to be a residence, but to offer all the services needed for living. Every third floor, between the modules, there was a wide corridor, like an interior street, which ran the length of the building from one end of the building to the other. This served as a sort of commercial street, with shops, eating places, a nursery school and recreational facilities. A running track and small stage for theater performances was located in the roof. The building itself was surrounded by trees and a small park.

Le Corbusier wrote later that the Unité d’Habitation concept was inspired by the visit he had made to the Florence Charterhouse at Galluzzo in Italy, in 1907 and 1910 during his early travels. He wanted to recreate, he wrote, an ideal place “for meditation and contemplation.” He also learned from the monastery, he wrote, that “standardization led to perfection,” and that “all of his life a man labours under this impulse: to make the home the temple of the family.”[48]

The Unité d’Habitation marked a turning point in the career of Le Corbusier; in 1952, he was made a Commander of the Légion d’Honneur in a ceremony held on the roof of his new building. He had progressed from being an outsider and critic of the architectural establishment to its centre, as the most prominent French architect.[49]

Postwar projects, United Nations Headquarters (1947–1952)

The Headquarters of the United Nations designed by Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer and Wallace K. Harrison (1947–1952)
Le Corbusier made another almost identical Unité d’Habitation in Rezé-les-Nantes in the Loire-Atlantique Department between 1948 and 1952, and three more over the following years, in Berlin, Briey-en-Forêt and Firminy; and he designed a factory for the company of Claude and Duval, in Saint-Dié in the Vosges.

In early 1947 Le Corbusier submitted a design for the Headquarters of the United Nations, which was to be built beside the East River in New York. Instead of competition, the design was to be selected by a Board of Design Consultants composed of leading international architects nominated by member governments, including Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer of Brazil, Howard Robertson from Britain, Nikolai Bassov of the Soviet Union, and five others from around the world. The committee was under the direction of the American architect Wallace K. Harrison, who was also architect for the Rockefeller family, which had donated the site for the building.

Le Corbusier had submitted his plan for the Secretariat, called Plan 23 of the 58 submitted. In Le Corbusier’s plan, where offices, council chambers and General Assembly hall were in a single block in the center of the site. He lobbied hard for his project, and asked the younger Brazilian architect, Niemeyer, to support and assist him on his plan. Niemeyer, to help Le Corbusier, refused to submit his own design and did not attend the meetings until the Director, Harrison, insisted. Niemeyer then submitted his plan, Plan 32, with the office building and councils and General Assembly in separate buildings. After much discussion, the Committee chose Niemeyer’s plan, but suggested that he collaborate with Le Corbusier on the final project. Le Corbusier urged Niemeyer to put the General Assembly Hall in the center of the site, though this would eliminate Niemeyer’s plan to have a large plaza in the center. Niemeyer agreed with Le Corbusier’s suggestion, and the headquarters was built, with minor modifications, according to their joint plan.[50]

Religious architecture (1950–1963)

The Chapelle of Notre-Dame-du-Haut in Ronchamp (1950–1955)

The Convent of Sainte Marie de La Tourette (1953–1960)

Meeting room inside the Convent of Sainte Marie de la Tourette

Church of Saint-Pierre, Firminy (1960–2006)

Interior of the Church of Saint-Pierre in Firminy. The sunlight through the roof projects the Constellation Orion on the walls. (1960–2006)

Le Corbusier was an avowed atheist. But he also had a strong belief in the ability of architecture to create a sacred and spiritual environment. In the postwar years he designed two important religious buildings; the Chapelle of Notre-Dame-du-Haut at Ronchamp (1950–1955); and the Convent of Sainte Marie de La Tourette (1953–1960). Le Corbusier wrote later that he was greatly aided in his religious architecture by a Dominican father, Père Couturier, who had founded a movement and review of modern religious art.

Le Corbusier first visited the remote mountain site of Ronchamp in May 1950, saw the ruins of the old chapel, and drew sketches of possible forms. He wrote afterwards: “In building this chapel, I wanted to create a place of silence, of peace, of prayer, of interior joy. The feeling of the sacred animated our effort. Some things are sacred, others aren’t, whether they’re religious or not.”[51]

The second major religious project undertaken by Le Corbusier was the Convent of Sainte Marie de La Tourette in L’Arbresle in the Rhone Department (1953–1960). Once again it was Father Couturier who engaged Le Corbusier in the project. He invited Le Corbusier to visit the starkly simple and imposing 12th–13th century Le Thoronet Abbey in Provence, and also used his memories of his youthful visit to the Erna Charterhouse in Florence. This project involved not only a chapel, but a library, refectory, rooms for meetings and reflection, and dormitories for the nuns. For the living space he used the same Modulor concept for measuring the ideal living space that he had used in the Unité d’Habitation in Marseille; height under the ceiling of 2.26 metres (7 feet 5 inches); and width 1.83 metres (6 feet 0 inches).[52]

Le Corbusier used raw concrete to construct the convent, which is placed on the side of a hill. The three blocks of dormitories U, closed by the chapel, with a courtyard in the center. The Convent has a flat roof, and is placed on sculpted concrete pillars. Each of the residential cells has small loggia with a concrete sunscreen looking out at the countryside. The centerpiece of the convent is the chapel, a plain box of concrete, which he called his “Box of miracles.” Unlike the highly finished façade of the Unité d’Habitation, the façade of the chapel is raw, unfinished concrete. He described the building in a letter to Albert Camus in 1957: “I’m taken with the idea of a “box of miracles”….as the name indicates, it is a rectangual box made of concrete. It doesn’t have any of the traditional theatrical tricks, but the possibility, as its name suggests, to make miracles.”[53] The interior of the chapel is extremely simple, only benches in a plain, unfinished concrete box, with light coming through a single square in the roof and six small band on the sides. The Crypt beneath has intense blue, red and yellow walls, and illumination by sunlight channeled from above. The monastery has other unusual features, including floor to ceiling panels of glass in the meeting rooms, window panels that fragmented the view into pieces, and a system of concrete and metal tubes like gun barrels which aimed sunlight through colored prisms and projected it onto the walls of sacristy and to the secondary altars of the crypt on the level below. These were whimsically termed the “”machine guns” of the sacristy and the “light cannons” of the crypt.[54]

In 1960, Le Corbusier began a third religious building, the Church of Saint Pierre in the new town of Firminy-Vert, where he had built a Unité d’Habitation and a cultural and sports centre. While he made the original design, construction did not begin until five years after his death, and work continued under different architects until it was completed in 2006. The most spectacular feature of the church is the sloping concrete tower that covers the entire interior. similar to that in the Assembly Building in his complex at Chandigarh. Windows high in the tower illuminate the interior. Le Corbusier originally proposed that tiny windows also project the form of a constellation on the walls. Later architects designed the church to project the constellation Orion.[55]

Chandigarh (1951–1956)

The High Court of Justice, Chandigarh (1951–1956)

Secretariat Building, Chandigarh (1952–1958)

Palace of Assembly (Chandigarh) (1952–1961)

Le Corbusier’s largest and most ambitious project was the design of Chandigarh, the capital city of the Haryana and Punjab States of India, created after India received independence in 1947. Le Corbusier was contacted in 1950 by Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, and invited to propose a project. An American architect, Albert Mayer, had made a plan in 1947 for a city of 150,000 inhabitants, but the Indian government wanted a grander and more monumental city. (The city today has a population of more than a million.) Corbusier worked on the plan with two British specialists in urban design and tropical climate architecture, Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew, and with his cousin, Pierre Jeanneret, who moved to India and supervised the construction until his death.

Le Corbusier, as always, was rhapsodic about his project; “It will be a city of trees,” he wrote, “of flowers and water, of houses as simple as those at the time of Homer, and of a few splendid edifices of the highest level of modernism, where the rules of mathematics will reign.”.[56] His plan called for residential, commercial and industrial areas, along with parks and a transportation infrastructure. In the middle was the capitol, a complex of four major government buildings; the Palace of the National Assembly, the High Court of Justice; the Palace of Secretariat of Ministers, and the Palace of the Governor. For financial and political reasons, the Palace of the Governor was dropped well into the construction of the city, throwing the final project somewhat off-balance.[57] From the beginning, Le Corbusier worked, as he reported, “Like a forced laborer.” He dismissed the earlier American plan as “Faux-Moderne” and overly filled with parking spaces roads. His intent was to present what he had learned in forty years of urban study, and also to show the French government the opportunities they had missed in not choosing him to rebuild French cities after the War.[57] His design made use of many of his favorite ideas; an architectural promenade, incorporating the local landscape and the sunlight and shadows into the design; the use of the Modulor to give a correct human scale to each element; and his favourite symbol, the open hand; (“the hand is open to give and to receive’.”) He placed a monumental open hand statue in a prominent place in the design.[57]

Le Corbusier’s design called for the use of raw concrete, whose surface not smoothed or polished and which showed the marks of the forms in which it dried. Pierre Jeanneret wrote to his cousin that he was in a continual battle with the construction workers, who could not resist the urge to smooth and finish the raw concrete, particularly when important visitors were coming to the site. At one point one thousand workers were employed on the site of the High Court of Justice. Le Corbusier wrote to his mother, “It is an architectural symphony which surpasses all my hopes, which flashes and develops under the light in a way which is unimaginable and unforgettable. From far, from up close, it provokes astonishment; all made with raw concrete and a cement cannon. Adorable, and grandiose. In all the centuries no one has seen that.”[58]

The High Court of Justice, begun in 1951, was finished in 1956. The building was radical in its design; a parallelogram topped with an inverted parasol. Along the walls were high concrete grills 1.5 metres (4 feet 11 inches) thick which served as sunshades. The entry featured a monumental ramp and columns that allowed the air to circulate. The pillars were originally white limestone, but in the 1960s they were repainted in bright colors, which better resisted the weather.[57]

The Secretariat, the largest building that housed the government offices, was constructed between 1952 and 1958. It is an enormous block 250 metres (820 feet) long and eight levels high, served by a ramp which extends from the ground to the top level. The ramp was designed to be partly sculptural and partly practical. Since there were no modern building cranes at the time of construction, the ramp was the only way to get materials to the top of the construction site. The Secretariat had two features which were borrowed from his design for the Unité d’Habitation in Marseille: concrete grill sunscreens over the windows and a roof terrace.[57]

The most important building of the capitol complex was the Palace of Assembly (1952–61), which faced the High Court at the other end of a five hundred meter esplanade with a large reflecting pool in the front. This building features a central courtyard, over which is the main meeting hall for the Assembly. On the roof on the rear of the building is a signature feature of Le Corbusier, a large tower, similar in form to the smokestack of a ship or the ventilation tower of a heating plant. Le Corbusier added touches of color and texture with an immense tapestry in the meeting hall and large gateway decorated with enamel. He wrote of this building, “A Palace magnificent in its effect, from the new art of raw concrete. It is magnificent and terrible; terrible meaning that there is nothing cold about it to the eyes.”[59]

Later life and work (1955–1965)

The National Museum of Western Art in Tokyo (1954–1959)

Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts (1960–1963)

The Centre Le Corbusier in Zürich (1962–1967)

The 1950s and 1960s, were a difficult period for Le Corbusier’s personal life; his wife Yvonne died in 1957, and his mother, to whom he was closely attached, died in 1960. He remained active in a wide variety of fields; in 1955 he published Poéme de l’angle droits, a portfolio of lithographs, published in the same collection as the book Jazz by Henri Matisse. In 1958 he collaborated with the composer Edgar Varèse on a work called Le Poème électronique, a show of sound and light, for the Philips Pavilion at the International Exposition in Brussels. In 1960 he published a new book, L’Atelier de la recherché patiente The workshop of patient research), simultaneously published in four languages. He received growing recognition for his pioneering work in modernist architecture; in 1959, a successful international campaign was launched to have his Villa Savoye, threatened with demolition, declared an historic monument; it was the first time that a work by a living architect received this distinction. In 1962, in the same year as the dedication of the Palace of the Assembly in Chandigarh, the first retrospective exhibit on his work was held at the National Museum of Modern Art in Paris. In 1964, in a ceremony held in his atelier on rue de Sèvres, he was awarded the Grand Cross of the Légion d’honneur by Culture Minister André Malraux.[60]

His later architectural work was extremely varied, and often based on designs of earlier projects. In 1952–1958, he designed a series of tiny vacation cabins, 2.26 by 2.26 by 2.6 metres (7.4 by 7.4 by 8.5 feet) in size, for a site next to the Mediterranean at Roquebrune-Cap-Martin. He built a similar cabin for himself, but the rest of the project was not realized until after his death. In 1953–1957, he designed a residential building for Brazilian students for the Cité de la Université in Paris. Between 1954 and 1959, he built the National Museum of Western Art in Tokyo. His other projects included a cultural centre and stadium for the town of Firminy, where he had built his first housing project (1955–1958); and a stadium in Baghdad, Iraq (much altered since its construction). He also constructed three new Unités d’Habitation, apartment blocks on the model of the original in Marseille, the first in Berlin (1956–1958), the second in Briey-en-Forêt in the Meurthe-et-Moselle Department; and the third (1959–1967) in Firminy. In 1960–1963, he built his only building in the United States; the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts in Cambridge, Massachusetts.[60]

At the time of his death in 1965, several projects were on the drawing boards; the church of Saint-Pierre in Firminy, finally completed in modified form in 2006; a Palace of Congresses for Strasbourg (1962–65), and a hospital in Venice, (1961–1965) which were never built. Le Corbusier designed an art gallery beside the lake in Zürich for gallery owner Heidi Weber in 1962–1967. Now called the Centre Le Corbusier, it is one of his last finished works.[61]


The holiday cabin where he spent his last days in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin
Against his doctor’s orders, on 27 August 1965, Le Corbusier went for a swim in the Mediterranean Sea at Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, France. His body was found by bathers and he was pronounced dead at 11 a.m. It was assumed that he may have suffered a heart attack. His funeral took place in the courtyard of the Louvre Palace on 1 September 1965, under the direction of writer and thinker André Malraux, who was at the time France’s Minister of Culture. He was buried alongside his wife in the grave he had designated at Roquebrune.[citation needed]

Le Corbusier’s death had a strong impact on the cultural and political world. Tributes came from around the world, even from some of Le Corbusier’s strongest artistic critics. Painter Salvador Dalí recognised his importance and sent a floral tribute. United States President Lyndon B. Johnson said, “His influence was universal and his works are invested with a permanent quality possessed by those of very few artists in our history.” The Soviet Union added, “Modern architecture has lost its greatest master”. While his funeral occurred in Paris, Japanese TV channels broadcast his Museum in Tokyo in what was at the time a unique media homage.[citation needed]

His grave is in the cemetery above Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, between Menton and Monaco in southern France.[citation needed]

The Fondation Le Corbusier (FLC) functions as his official estate.[62] The US copyright representative for the Fondation Le Corbusier is the Artists Rights Society.[63]

The Five Points of a Modern Architecture
Main article: Le Corbusier’s Five Points of Architecture
Le Corbusier defined the principles of his new architecture in Les cinq points de l’architecture moderne, published in 1927, and co-authored by his cousin, Pierre Jeanneret. They summarized the lessons he had learned in the previous years, which he put literally into concrete form in his villas constructed of the late 1920s, most dramatically in the Villa Savoye (1928–1931)

The five points are:

The Pilotis, or pylon. The building is raised up on reinforced concrete pylons, which allows for free circulation on the ground level, and eliminates dark and damp parts of the house.
The Roof Terrace. The sloping roof is replaced by a flat roof; the roof can be used as a garden, for promenades, sports or a swimming pool.
The Free Plan. Load-bearing walls are replaced by a steel or reinforced concrete columns, so the interior can be freely designed, and interior walls can put anywhere, or left out entirely. The structure of the building is not visible from the outside.
The Ribbon Window. Since the walls do not support the house, the windows can run the entire length of the house, so all rooms can get equal light.
The Free Façade. Since the building is supported by columns in the interior, the façade can be much lighter and more open, or made entirely of glass. There is no need for lintels or other structure around the windows.
“Architectural Promenade”
The “Architectural Promenade” was another idea dear to Le Corbusier, which he particularly put into play in his design of the Villa Savoye. In 1928, in Une Maison, un Palais, he described it: “Arab architecture gives us a precious lesson: it is best appreciated in walking, on foot. It is in walking, in going from one place to another, that you see develop the features of the architecture. In this house (Villa Savoye) you find a veritable architectural promenade, offering constantly varying aspects, unexpected, sometimes astonishing.” The promenade at Villa Savoye, Le Corbusier wrote, both in the interior of the house and on the roof terrace, often erased the traditional difference between the inside and outside.[64]

Ville Radieuse and Urbanism
In the 1930s, Le Corbusier expanded and reformulated his ideas on urbanism, eventually publishing them in La Ville radieuse (The Radiant City) in 1935. Perhaps the most significant difference between the Contemporary City and the Radiant City is that the latter abandoned the class-based stratification of the former; housing was now assigned according to family size, not economic position.[65] Some have read dark overtones into The Radiant City: from the “astonishingly beautiful assemblage of buildings” that was Stockholm, for example, Le Corbusier saw only “frightening chaos and saddening monotony.” He dreamed of “cleaning and purging” the city, bringing “a calm and powerful architecture”—referring to steel, plate glass, and reinforced concrete. Although Le Corbusier’s designs for Stockholm did not succeed, later architects took his ideas and partly “destroyed” the city with them.[66]

Le Corbusier hoped that politically minded industrialists in France would lead the way with their efficient Taylorist and Fordist strategies adopted from American industrial models to reorganize society. As Norma Evenson has put it, “the proposed city appeared to some an audacious and compelling vision of a brave new world, and to others a frigid megalomaniacally scaled negation of the familiar urban ambient.”[67]

Le Corbusier “His ideas—his urban planning and his architecture—are viewed separately,” Perelman noted, “whereas they are one and the same thing.”[68]

In La Ville radieuse, he conceived an essentially apolitical society, in which the bureaucracy of economic administration effectively replaces the state.[69]

Le Corbusier was heavily indebted to the thought of the 19th-century French utopians Saint-Simon and Charles Fourier. There is a noteworthy resemblance between the concept of the unité and Fourier’s phalanstery.[70] From Fourier, Le Corbusier adopted at least in part his notion of administrative, rather than political, government.

Main article: Modulor
The Modulor was a standard model of the human form which Le Corbusier devised to determine the correct amount of living space needed for residents in his buildings. It was also his rather original way of dealing with differences between the metric system and British or American system, since the Modulor was not attached to either one.

Le Corbusier explicitly used the golden ratio in his Modulor system for the scale of architectural proportion. He saw this system as a continuation of the long tradition of Vitruvius, Leonardo da Vinci’s “Vitruvian Man”, the work of Leon Battista Alberti, and others who used the proportions of the human body to improve the appearance and function of architecture. In addition to the golden ratio, Le Corbusier based the system on human measurements, Fibonacci numbers, and the double unit. Many scholars see the Modulor as a humanistic expression but it is also argued that: “It’s exactly the opposite (…) It’s the mathematicization of the body, the standardization of the body, the rationalization of the body.”[71]

He took Leonardo’s suggestion of the golden ratio in human proportions to an extreme: he sectioned his model human body’s height at the navel with the two sections in golden ratio, then subdivided those sections in golden ratio at the knees and throat; he used these golden ratio proportions in the Modulor system.

Le Corbusier’s 1927 Villa Stein in Garches exemplified the Modulor system’s application. The villa’s rectangular ground plan, elevation, and inner structure closely approximate golden rectangles.[72]

Le Corbusier placed systems of harmony and proportion at the centre of his design philosophy, and his faith in the mathematical order of the universe was closely bound to the golden section and the Fibonacci series, which he described as “rhythms apparent to the eye and clear in their relations with one another. And these rhythms are at the very root of human activities. They resound in Man by an organic inevitability, the same fine inevitability which causes the tracing out of the Golden Section by children, old men, savages, and the learned.”[73]

Open Hand

Open Hand Monument in Chandigarh, India
The Open Hand (La Main Ouverte) is a recurring motif in Le Corbusier’s architecture, a sign for him of “peace and reconciliation. It is open to give and open to receive.” The largest of the many Open Hand sculptures that Le Corbusier created is a 26-meter-high (85 ft) version in Chandigarh, India known as Open Hand Monument.

Main article: Le Corbusier’s Furniture
Le Corbusier was an eloquent critic of the finely crafted, hand-made furniture, made with rare and exotic woods, inlays and coverings, presented at the 1925 Exposition of Decorative Arts. Following his usual method, Le Corbusier first wrote a book with his theories of furniture, complete with memorable slogans. In his 1925 book L’Art Décoratif d’aujourd’hui, he called for furniture that used inexpensive materials and could be mass-produced. Le Corbusier described three different furniture types: type-needs, type-furniture, and human-limb objects. He defined human-limb objects as: “Extensions of our limbs and adapted to human functions that are type-needs and type-functions, therefore type-objects and type-furniture. The human-limb object is a docile servant. A good servant is discreet and self-effacing in order to leave his master free. Certainly, works of art are tools, beautiful tools. And long live the good taste manifested by choice, subtlety, proportion, and harmony”. He further declared, “Chairs are architecture, sofas are bourgeois”,

Frame of an LC4 chair by Le Corbusier and Perriand (1927–28) at Museum of Decorative Arts, Paris
Le Corbusier first relied on ready-made furniture from Thonet to furnish his projects, such as his pavilion at the 1925 Exposition. In 1928, following the publication of his theories, he began experimenting with furniture design. In 1928, he invited the architect Charlotte Perriand to join his studio as a furniture designer. His cousin, Pierre Jeanneret, also collaborated on many of the designs. For the manufacture of his furniture, he turned to the German firm Gebrüder Thonet, which had begun making chairs with tubular steel, a material originally used for bicycles, in the early 1920s. Le Corbusier admired the design of Marcel Breuer and the Bauhaus, who in 1925 had begun making sleek modern tubular club chairs. Mies van der Rohe had begun making his own version in a sculptural curved form with a cane seat in 1927.[74]

The first results of the collaboration between Le Corbusier and Perriand were three types of chairs made with chrome-plated tubular steel frames: The LC4, Chaise Longue, (1927–28), with a covering of cowhide, which gave it a touch of exoticism; the Fauteuil Grand Confort (LC3) (1928–29), a club chair with a tubular frame which resembled the comfortable Art Deco club chairs that became popular in the 1920s; and the Fauteuil à dossier basculant (LC4) (1928–29), a low seat suspended in a tubular steel frame, also with a cowhide upholstery. These chairs were designed specifically for two of his projects, the Maison la Roche in Paris and a pavilion for Barbara and Henry Church. All three clearly showed the influence of Mies van der Rohe and Marcel Breuer. The line of furniture was expanded with additional designs for Le Corbusier’s 1929 Salon d’Automne installation, ‘Equipment for the Home’. Despite the intention of Le Corbusier that his furniture should be inexpensive and mass-produced, his pieces were originally costly to make and were not mass-produced until many years later, when he was famous. [75]

The political views of Le Corbusier were rather vague and variable over time.[citation needed] In the 1920s, he co-founded and contributed articles about urbanism to the fascist journals Plans, Prélude and L’Homme Réel.[76][77] He also allegedly penned pieces in favour of Nazi anti-semitism for those journals, as well as “hateful editorials”.[78] Between 1925 and 1928, Le Corbusier had connections to Le Faisceau, a short-lived French fascist party led by Georges Valois. Valois later became an anti-fascist.[79] Le Corbusier knew another former member of Faisceau, Hubert Lagardelle, a former labor leader and syndicalist who had become disaffected with the political left. In 1934, after Lagardelle had obtained a position at the French embassy in Rome, he arranged for Le Corbusier to lecture on architecture in Italy. Lagardelle later served as minister of labor in the pro-Axis Vichy regime. While Le Corbusier sought commissions from the Vichy regime, particularly the redesign of Marseille after its Jewish population had been forcefully removed,[77] he was unsuccessful, and the only appointment he received from it was membership of a committee studying urbanism.[citation needed] Alexis Carrel, a eugenicist surgeon, appointed Le Corbusier to the Department of Bio-Sociology of the Foundation for the Study of Human Problems, an institute promoting eugenics policies under the Vichy regime.[77]

Le Corbusier has been accused of anti-semitism. He wrote to his mother in October 1940, prior to a referendum held by the Vichy government: “The Jews are having a bad time. I occasionally feel sorry. But it appears their blind lust for money has rotted the country”. He was also accused of belittling the Muslim population of Algeria, then part of France. When Le Corbusier proposed a plan for the rebuilding of Algiers, he condemned the existing housing for European Algerians, complaining that it was inferior to that inhabited by indigenous Algerians: “the civilized live like rats in holes”, while “the barbarians live in solitude, in well-being.”[80] His plan for rebuilding Algiers was rejected, and thereafter Le Corbusier mostly avoided politics.[81]

Few other 20th-century architects were praised, or criticized, as much as Le Corbusier. In his eulogy to Le Corbusier at the memorial ceremony for the architect in the courtyard of the Louvre on 1 September 1965, French Culture Minister André Malraux declared, “Le Corbusier had some great rivals, but none of them had the same significance in the revolution of architecture, because none bore insults so patiently and for so long.”[82]

Later criticism of Le Corbusier was directed at his ideas of urban planning. In 1998 the architectural historian Witold Rybczynski wrote in Time magazine:

“He called it the Ville Radieuse, the Radiant City. Despite the poetic title, his urban vision was authoritarian, inflexible and simplistic. Wherever it was tried—in Chandigarh by Le Corbusier himself or in Brasilia by his followers—it failed. Standardization proved inhuman and disorienting. The open spaces were inhospitable; the bureaucratically imposed plan, socially destructive. In the US, the Radiant City took the form of vast urban-renewal schemes and regimented public housing projects that damaged the urban fabric beyond repair. Today, these megaprojects are being dismantled, as superblocks give way to rows of houses fronting streets and sidewalks. Downtowns have discovered that combining, not separating, different activities is the key to success. So is the presence of lively residential neighborhoods, old as well as new. Cities have learned that preserving history makes more sense than starting from zero. It has been an expensive lesson, and not one that Le Corbusier intended, but it too is part of his legacy.”[83]

Technological historian and architecture critic Lewis Mumford wrote in Yesterday’s City of Tomorrow that the extravagant heights of Le Corbusier’s skyscrapers had no reason for existence apart from the fact that they had become technological possibilities. The open spaces in his central areas had no reason for existence either, Mumford wrote, since on the scale he imagined there was no motive during the business day for pedestrian circulation in the office quarter. By “mating utilitarian and financial image of the skyscraper city to the romantic image of the organic environment, Le Corbusier had, in fact, produced a sterile hybrid.”

The public housing projects influenced by his ideas have been criticized for isolating poor communities in monolithic high-rises and breaking the social ties integral to a community’s development. One of his most influential detractors has been Jane Jacobs, who delivered a scathing critique of Le Corbusier’s urban design theories in her seminal work The Death and Life of Great American Cities.

For some critics, the urbanism of Le Corbusier’s was the model for a fascist state.[84] These critics cited Le Corbusier himself when he wrote that “not all citizens could become leaders. The technocratic elite, the industrialists, financiers, engineers, and artists would be located in the city centre, while the workers would be removed to the fringes of the city”.[85]


This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: “Le Corbusier” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Gustavo Capanema Palace, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
Le Corbusier was concerned by problems he saw in industrial cities at the turn of the 20th century. He thought that industrial housing techniques led to crowding, dirtiness, and a lack of a moral landscape. He was a leader of the modernist movement to create better living conditions and a better society through housing. Ebenezer Howard’s Garden Cities of Tomorrow heavily influenced Le Corbusier and his contemporaries.[86]

Le Corbusier revolutionized urban planning, and was a founding member of the Congrès International d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM).[87] One of the first to realize how the automobile would change human society, Le Corbusier conceived the city of the future with large apartment buildings isolated in a park-like setting on pilotis. Le Corbusier’s plans were adopted by builders of public housing in Europe and the United States. In Great Britain urban planners turned to Le Corbusier’s “Cities in the Sky” as a cheaper method of building public housing from the late 1950s.[88] Le Corbusier criticized any effort at ornamentation of the buildings. The large spartan structures in cities, but not part of it, have been criticized for being boring and unfriendly to pedestrians.[89]

Several of the many architects who worked for Le Corbusier in his studio became prominent, including painter-architect Nadir Afonso, who absorbed Le Corbusier’s ideas into his own aesthetics theory. Lúcio Costa’s city plan of Brasília and the industrial city of Zlín planned by František Lydie Gahura in the Czech Republic are based on his ideas. Le Corbusier’s thinking had profound effects on city planning and architecture in the Soviet Union during the Constructivist era.

Le Corbusier harmonized and lent credence to the idea of space as a set of destinations between which mankind moved continuously. He gave credibility to the automobile as transporter, and to freeways in urban spaces. His philosophies were useful to urban real estate developers in the American post-World War II period because they justified and lent intellectual support to the desire to raze traditional urban space for high density, high profit urban concentration. The freeways connected this new urbanism to low density, low cost, highly profitable suburban locales available to be developed for middle class single-family housing.

Missing from this scheme of movement was connectivity between isolated urban villages created for lower-middle and working classes, and the destination points in Le Corbusier’s plan: suburban and rural areas, and urban commercial centers. The freeways as designed traveled over, at, or beneath grade levels of the living spaces of the urban poor, for example the Cabrini–Green housing project in Chicago. Such projects with no freeway exit ramps, cut off by freeway rights-of-way, became isolated from jobs and services concentrated at Le Corbusier’s nodal transportation end points. As jobs migrated to the suburbs, urban village dwellers found themselves without freeway access points in their communities or public mass transit that could economically reach suburban job centers. Late in the post-War period, suburban job centers found labor shortages to be such a critical problem that they sponsored urban-to-suburban shuttle bus services to fill vacant working class and lower-middle class jobs, which did not typically pay enough to afford car ownership.

Le Corbusier influenced architects and urbanists worldwide. In the United States, Shadrach Woods; in Spain, Francisco Javier Sáenz de Oiza; in Brazil, Oscar Niemeyer; In Mexico, Mario Pani Darqui; in Chile, Roberto Matta; in Argentina, Antoni Bonet i Castellana (a Catalan exile), Juan Kurchan, Jorge Ferrari Hardoy, Amancio Williams, and Clorindo Testa in his first era; in Uruguay, the professors Justino Serralta and Carlos Gómez Gavazzo; in Colombia, Germán Samper Gnecco, Rogelio Salmona, and Dicken Castro; in Peru, Abel Hurtado and José Carlos Ortecho.

Le Corbusier’s design was cited as an inspiration for Kanye West’s album My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy.[90]

Fondation Le Corbusier

Le Corbusier, work reproduced in Život 2 (1922)
The Fondation Le Corbusier is a private foundation and archive honoring the work of Le Corbusier. It operates Maison La Roche, a museum located in the 16th arrondissement at 8–10, square du Dr Blanche, Paris, France, which is open daily except Sunday.

The foundation was established in 1968. It now owns Maison La Roche and Maison Jeanneret (which form the foundation’s headquarters), as well as the apartment occupied by Le Corbusier from 1933 to 1965 at rue Nungesser et Coli in Paris 16e, and the “Small House” he built for his parents in Corseaux on the shores of Lac Leman (1924).

Maison La Roche and Maison Jeanneret (1923–24), also known as the La Roche-Jeanneret house, is a pair of semi-detached houses that was Le Corbusier’s third commission in Paris. They are laid out at right angles to each other, with iron, concrete, and blank, white façades setting off a curved two-story gallery space. Maison La Roche is now a museum containing about 8,000 original drawings, studies and plans by Le Corbusier (in collaboration with Pierre Jeanneret from 1922 to 1940), as well as about 450 of his paintings, about 30 enamels, about 200 other works on paper, and a sizable collection of written and photographic archives. It describes itself as the world’s largest collection of Le Corbusier drawings, studies, and plans.[62][91]

In 1937, Le Corbusier was named Chevalier of the Légion d’honneur. In 1945, he was promoted to Officier of the Légion d’honneur. In 1952, he was promoted to Commandeur of the Légion d’honneur. Finally, on 2 July 1964, Le Corbusier was named Grand Officier of the Légion d’honneur.[1]
He received the Frank P. Brown Medal and AIA Gold Medal in 1961.
The University of Cambridge awarded Le Corbusier an honorary degree in June 1959.[92]
World Heritage Site
In 2016, seventeen of Le Corbusier’s buildings spanning seven countries were identified as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, reflecting “outstanding contribution to the Modern Movement”.[93]

Le Corbusier’s portrait was featured on the 10 Swiss francs banknote, pictured with his distinctive eyeglasses.

The following place-names carry his name:

Place Le Corbusier, Paris, near the site of his atelier on the Rue de Sèvres
Le Corbusier Boulevard, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Place Le Corbusier in his hometown of La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
Le Corbusier Street in the partido of Malvinas Argentinas, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
Le Corbusier Street in Le Village Parisien of Brossard, Quebec, Canada
Le Corbusier Promenade, a promenade along the water at Roquebrune-Cap-Martin
Le Corbusier Museum, Sector- 19 Chandigarh, India
Le Corbusier Museum in Stuttgart am Weissenhof
Main article: List of Le Corbusier buildings
1923: Villa La Roche, Paris, France
1925: Villa Jeanneret, Paris, France
1928: Villa Savoye, Poissy-sur-Seine, France
1929: Cité du Refuge, Armée du Salut, Paris, France
1931: Palace of the Soviets, Moscow, USSR (project)
1931: Immeuble Clarté, Geneva, Switzerland
1933: Tsentrosoyuz, Moscow, USSR
1947–1952: Unité d’Habitation, Marseille, France
1949–1952: United Nations headquarters, New York City, U.S. (Consultant)
1949–1953: Curutchet House, La Plata, Argentina (project manager: Amancio Williams)
1950–1954: Chapelle Notre Dame du Haut, Ronchamp, France
1951: Maisons Jaoul, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
1951: Buildings in Ahmedabad, India
1951: Sanskar Kendra Museum, Ahmedabad
1951: ATMA House
1951: Villa Sarabhai, Ahmedabad
1951: Villa Shodhan, Ahmedabad
1951: Villa of Chinubhai Chimanlal, Ahmedabad
1952: Unité d’Habitation of Nantes-Rezé, Nantes, France
1952–1959: Buildings in Chandigarh, India
1952: Palace of Justice
1952: Museum and Gallery of Art
1953: Secretariat Building
1953: Governor’s Palace
1955: Palace of Assembly
1959: Government College of Art (GCA) and the Chandigarh College of Architecture (CCA)
1957: Maison du Brésil, Cité Universitaire, Paris, France
1957–1960: Sainte Marie de La Tourette, near Lyon, France (with Iannis Xenakis)
1957: Unité d’Habitation of Berlin-Charlottenburg, Flatowallee 16, Berlin, Germany
1962: Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.
1964–1969: Firminy-Vert, France
1964: Unité d’Habitation of Firminy
1965: Maison de la culture de Firminy-Vert
1967: Heidi Weber Museum (Centre Le Corbusier), Zürich, Switzerland
Books by Le Corbusier
1918: Après le cubisme (After Cubism), with Amédée Ozenfant
1923: Vers une architecture (Towards an Architecture) (frequently mistranslated as “Towards a New Architecture”)
1925: Urbanisme (Urbanism)
1925: La Peinture moderne (Modern Painting), with Amédée Ozenfant
1925: L’Art décoratif d’aujourd’hui (The Decorative Arts of Today)
1930: Précisions sur un état présent de l’architecture et de l’urbanisme (Precisions on the present state of architecture and urbanism)
1931: Premier clavier de couleurs (First Color Keyboard)
1935: Aircraft
1935: La Ville radieuse (The Radiant City)
1942: Charte d’Athènes (Athens Charter)
1943: Entretien avec les étudiants des écoles d’architecture (A Conversation with Architecture Students)
1945: Les Trois établissements Humains (The Three Human Establishments)
1948: Le Modulor (The Modulor)
1953: Le Poeme de l’Angle Droit (The Poem of the Right Angle)
1955: Le Modulor 2 (The Modulor 2)
1959: Deuxième clavier de couleurs (Second Colour Keyboard)
1966: Le Voyage d’Orient (The Voyage to the East)
See also
Crystal Cubism
Butterfly roof
Mathematics and art
Raoul Albert La Roche (swiss donator and collector of art)
Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, Archives nationales; site de Fontainebleau, Légion d’honneur recipient, birth certificate. Culture.gouv.fr. Retrieved on 27 February 2018.
“The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement”. Retrieved 14 October 2016.
Journel 2015, p. 32.
Marc Solitaire, Le Corbusier et l’urbain – la rectification du damier froebelien, pp. 93–117.
Actes du colloque La ville et l’urbanisme après Le Corbusier, éditions d’en Haut 1993 – ISBN 2-88251-033-0.
Marc Solitaire, Le Corbusier entre Raphael et Fröbel, pp. 9–27, Journal d’histoire de l’architecture N°1, Presses universitaires de Grenoble 1988 – ISBN 2-7061-0325-6.
Le Corbusier, L’Art décoratif d’aujourdhui (1925), p. 198.
Cited by Jean Petit, Le Corbusier lui-meme, Rousseau, Geneva 1970, p. 28.
Journel 2015, p. 49.
Journel 2015, p. 48.
Letter to Eplattenier in Dumont, Le Corbusier, Lettres a ses maitres, vol. 2, pp. 82–83.
Journel 2015, pp. 32–33.
Journel 2015, pp. 48–9.
Choay, Françoise (1960). Le Corbusier. George Braziller, Inc. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-0-8076-0104-4.
Letter to Auguste Perret (1915), cited in Lettres a ces Maitres, vol. 1, p. 33.
Tim Benton, Les Villas de Le Corbusier 1920–1929, Philippe Sers éd. Paris, 1987.
cited by Turner, Paul, “La Formation de Le Corbusier”, Paris, Macula, 1987, p. 218.
Journel 2015, p. 50–51.
cited in Lettres a css maitres, vol. 1, p. 181.
Journel 2015, p. 50.
Larousse, Éditions. “Encyclopédie Larousse en ligne – Charles Édouard Jeanneret dit Le Corbusier”. larousse.fr.
Corbusier, Le; Jenger, Jean (1 January 2002). Le Corbusier: choix de lettres. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783764364557 – via Google Books.
Repères biographiques, Fondation Le Corbusier. Fondationlecorbusier.asso.fr. Retrieved on 27 February 2018.
Le Corbusier 1923, pp. 1–150.
Arwas 1992, p. 46.
Arwas 1992, p. 49.
Le Corbusier, L’Art décoratif d’aujourd’hui, Paris, G. Crès, « L’Esprit nouveau », 1925. Réédition
Yannis Tsiomis, Le Corbusier, L’Art décoratif d’aujourd’hui et « la loi du ripolin », Presses universitaires de Paris Nanterre, 2012
Le Corbusier, L’art décoratif d’aujourd’hui, (originally 1925, Flammarion edition of 1996, ISBN+978-2-0812-2062-1.
Le Corbusier, p. 98.
Le Corbusier 1925, p. 70–81.
Benton, Charlotte, Benton, Tim, Wood, Ghislaine, Art Déco dans le monde- 1910–39, 2010, Renaissance du Livre, ISBN 9782507003906, pp. 16–17.
Journel 2015, p. 37.
Bony 2012, p. 83.
Journel 2015, p. 116.
“Architecture View; Le Corbusier’s Housing Project-Flexible Enough to Endure; by Ada Louise Huxtable”. The New York Times. 15 March 1981.
Bony 2012, pp. 84–85.
Journel 2015, p. 128.
Journel 2015, p. 210.
Journel 2015, p. 98.
Journel 2015, p. 100.
Time Magazine, article on Man of the Year, 5 May 1961
Journel 2015, p. 218.
Fishman 1982, pp. 244–246.
“Le Corbusier plus facho que fada”. Liberation. 18 March 2015. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
Journet 2015, p. 215.
Bony 2012, p. 143.
Journel 2015, p. 139.
Journel 2015, pp. 152–158.
“Oscar Niemeyer and the United Nations Headquarters (1947–1949)”. United Nations. December 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
Le Corbusier, Ronchamp”, Hatje, Stuttgart, (1925), p. 25.
Jounret 2015, pp. 154–55.
Letter to Albert Camus, 13 February 1957, FLC (Fondation Le Corbusier), E1-12-154)
Journet 2015, pp. 184–185.
Jounret 2015, p. 165.
Letter to his wife Yvonne, 27 February 1951, FLC-R1-12-87. Cited by Journel, p. 182.
Journel 2015, p. 182.
letter to his mother, 19 November 1954, FLC-R2-103. Cited by Journlet, p. 184.
Letter to his brother Albert, 26 March 1961, FLC-R1-10-586, cited by Journel, p. 185.
Journel 2015, p. 216.
Journel 2015, p. 212.
“Foundation: History”. Fondation Le Corbusier. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
“Our Most Frequently Requested Prominent Artists”. Artists Rights Society. 2003. Archived from the original on 31 January 2009. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
Le Corbusier, Une maison – un palais, G. Crès & Cie (1928), pp. 70–78
Fishman, Robert (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0262560238.
Dalrymple, Theodore (Autumn 2009). “The Architect as Totalitarian: Le Corbusier’s baleful influence”. City Journal. 19 (4). Retrieved 18 March 2014.
Evenson, Norma (1969). Le Corbusier: The Machine and the Grand Design. New York: George Braziller. p. 7.
Munro, Cait (17 April 2005). “New Books Claim Le Corbusier Was a Fascist”. Artnet news.
Fishman 1982, p. 228.
Serenyi, Peter (December 1967). “Le Corbusier, Fourier, and the Monastery of Ema”. The Art Bulletin. 49 (4): 282. doi:10.2307/3048487. JSTOR 3048487.
Donadio, Rachel (12 July 2015). “New York Times”. nytimes.com.
Padovan, Richard (2 November 1999). Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture. Taylor & Francis. p. 320. ISBN 978-0-419-22780-9. from Le Corbusier, The Modulor p.35: “Both the paintings and the architectural designs make use of the golden section.”
padovan 1999, p. 316.
Riley 2004, p. 382.
Riley 2004, p. 383.
Brott, Simone (2013). “In the Shadow of the Enlightenment Le Corbusier, Le Faisceau and Georges Valois”. Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand. 2 (30): 777–789. his contribution to three fascist revues: Plans, Prélude and L’Homme Réel
Brott, Simone (8 December 2017). “The Le Corbusier Scandal, or, was Le Corbusier a Fascist?”. Fascism. 6 (2): 196–227. doi:10.1163/22116257-00602003. ISSN 2211-6249.
Samuel, Henry (16 April 2015). “Le Corbusier was ‘militant fascist’, two new books on French architect claim”. Mr Jarcy said that in “Plans” Le Corbusier wrote in support of Nazi anti-Semitism and in “Prelude” co-wrote “hateful editorials
After becoming a wartime resistance fighter, Georges Valois was arrested and died in a Nazi concentration camp.
Celik, Zeynep (28 July 1997). Urban Forms and Colonial Confrontations: Algiers under French Rule. University of California Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0520204577.
Antliff, Mark (2007). Avant-Garde Fascism: The Mobilization of Myth, Art, and Culture in France, 1909–1939. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-9047-3.
André Malraux, funeral oration for Le Corbusier, 1 September 1965, cited in Journal (2015), p. 3.1
Rybcznski, Witold, Time magazine, 8 June 1998.
Antliff, Mark (1997). “La Cité francaise: George Valois, Le Corbusier, and Fascist Theories of Urbanism”. In Antliff, Mark; Affron, Matthew (eds.). Fascist Visions: Art and Ideology in France and Italy. Princeton University Press. pp. 134–170. ISBN 978-0-691027388.
Le Corbusier. Urbanism 1. p. 39.
FITTING, PETER (2002). “Urban Planning/Utopian Dreaming: Le Corbusier’s Chandigarh Today”. Utopian Studies. 13 (1): 69–93. ISSN 1045-991X. JSTOR 20718410.
Tate. “Le Corbusier (Charles-Edouard Jeanneret) 1887-1965”. Tate. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
“Le Corbusier – enfant terrible of Modernist Architecture? / Pash Living Blog”. pash-living.co.uk.
The Most Important People of the 20th Century (Part-II): Artists & Entertainers, Page 144
Capps, Kriston (12 June 2013) Kanye West Cites Le Corbusier Lamp as Inspiration. architectmagazine.com
“Musée: Fondation Le Corbusier – Maison La Roche”. Paris Convention and Visitors Bureau. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
“About the Faculty”. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
“The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement”. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
Arwas, Victor (1992). Art Deco. Harry N. Abrams Inc. ISBN 978-0-8109-1926-6.
Sarbjit Bahga, Surinder Bahga (2014) Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret: The Indian Architecture, CreateSpace, ISBN 978-1495906251.
Bony, Anne (2012). L’Architecture moderne. Larousse. ISBN 978-2-03-587641-6.
Behrens, Roy R. (2005). Cook Book: Gertrude Stein, William Cook and Le Corbusier. Dysart, Iowa: Bobolink Books. ISBN 0-9713244-1-7.
Brooks, H. Allen (1999) Le Corbusier’s Formative Years: Charles-Edouard Jeanneret at La Chaux-de-Fonds, Paperback Edition, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-07582-6.
Eliel, Carol S. (2002). L’Esprit Nouveau: Purism in Paris, 1918–1925. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. ISBN 0-8109-6727-8.
Curtis, William J.R. (1994) Le Corbusier: Ideas and Forms, Phaidon, ISBN 978-0-7148-2790-2.
Frampton, Kenneth. (2001). Le Corbusier, London, Thames and Hudson.
Jencks, Charles (2000) Le Corbusier and the Continual Revolution in Architecture, The Monacelli Press, ISBN 978-1-58093-077-2.
Jornod, Naïma and Jornod, Jean-Pierre (2005) Le Corbusier (Charles Edouard Jeanneret), catalogue raisonné de l’oeuvre peint, Skira, ISBN 88-7624-203-1.
Journel, Guillemette Morel (2015). Le Corbusier- Construire la Vie Moderne (in French). Editions du Patrimoine: Centre des Monument Nationaux. ISBN 978-2-7577-0419-6.
Korolija Fontana-Giusti, Gordana. (2015) ‘Transgression and Ekphrasis in Le Corbusier’s Journey to the East’ in Transgression: Towards the Expanded Field in Architecture, edited by Louis Rice and David Littlefield, London: Routledge, 57–75, ISBN 978-1-13-881892-7.
Le Corbusier (1925). L’Art décoratif d’aujourdhui (in French). G. Crés et Cie.
Le Corbusier (1923). Vers une architecture (in French). Flammarion (1995). ISBN 978-2-0812-1744-7.
Dumont, Marie-Jeanne, ed. (2002). Le Corbusier- Lettres a ses maitres (in French). Editions du Linteau.
Solitaire, Marc (2016) Au retour de La Chaux-de-Fonds: Le Corbusier & Froebel, editions Wiking, ISBN 978-2-9545239-1-0.
Riley, Noël (2004). Grammaire des Arts Décoratifs (in French). Flammarion.
Von Moos, Stanislaus (2009) Le Corbusier: Elements of A Synthesis, Rotterdam, 010 Publishers.
Weber, Nicholas Fox (2008) Le Corbusier: A Life, Alfred A. Knopf, ISBN 0-375-41043-0.
External links
Library resources about
Le Corbusier
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
By Le Corbusier
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
Wikiquote has quotations related to: Le Corbusier
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Le Corbusier.
Le Corbusier at the Encyclopædia Britannica
Le Corbusier architectural drawings, 1935–1961. Held by the Department of Drawings & Archives, Avery Architectural & Fine Arts Library, Columbia University.
Fondation Le Corbusier – Official site
Projects by Le Corbusier – ArchDaily
Related news about Le Corbusier – ArchDaily
Spotlight – ArchDaily
Le Corbusier on Artsy.net
Le Corbusier’s Working Lifestyle: ‘Working with Le Corbusier’
Plummer, Henry. Cosmos of Light: The Sacred Architecture of Le Corbusier. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.
“Le Corbusier and the Sun”. solarhousehistory.com.